Latitudinal patterns in stabilizing density dependence of forest communities
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown reduced performance in plants surrounded by same-species neighbors, a phenomenon called conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD). This research comprehensively assesses latitudinal CNDD patterns using dynamic mortality data across 23 forest sites. While stabilizing CNDD appeared at nearly all sites, it was not stronger in tropical regions as previously hypothesized. However, in tropical communities, rare and intermediate-abundant species experienced stronger stabilizing CNDD than common species – a pattern absent in temperate forests. This suggests CNDD more effectively regulates tropical tree population abundances, potentially contributing to greater stabilization and higher local diversity in tropical forests.
What the paper shows and why it matters (AI-generated)
The textbook expectation is that stabilizing conspecific negative density dependence — crowded seedlings faring worse near their own kind — should be strongest in the tropics, the usual explanation for why tropical forests hold so many more tree species. Data from 23 forest sites worldwide don't support that simple gradient: stabilizing CNDD shows up almost everywhere, but in the tropics it's concentrated specifically in rare and intermediate-abundance species, a pattern absent in temperate forests. Published in Nature and already drawing direct follow-up work on legacy and aggregation effects in the same density-dependence literature, the result sharpens rather than overturns the classic diversity-maintenance story.