A novel age-informative polygenic score improves predictive ability for kidney function and kidney function decline
Abstract
Polygenic scores (PGSs) are widely used to summarize the joint genetic effects for disease-related traits. However, while age-dependent genetic effects are increasingly recognized, their integration into PGSs remains underexplored. Kidney function, assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), has strong age-related genetic effects, and prediction of kidney function decline is an unmet need. We develop an age-informative PGS for quantitative traits by generating age-specific weights via main and interaction effects and compare its performance to the age-agnostic PGS in theory and real data of eGFR. We test PGSs across 282 kidney function SNPs in cross-sectional and longitudinal data from UK Biobank (n=348,275, m=1,520,382) and independent population-based individuals aged 25 to 98 years (KORA and AugUR; n=9,057, m=16,804). In theory and real data, we illustrate that ignoring age mis-specifies genetic effects. The age-informative PGS has better performance than the age-agnostic PGS in young and old individuals (KORA and AugUR: 6.3% versus 5.9% of eGFR variance in 25- to 45-year-old, 2.3% versus 1.8% in 75- to 98-year-old). The PGS based on interaction effects explains more of the eGFR-decline variability than the age-agnostic PGS. The highest versus lowest PGS quintile predict eGFR-decline of -0.88 (95%-CI=[-0.93;-0.83]) versus -0.75 ml/min/1.73m2 (95%-CI=[-0.79;-0.71]) on the population-level, similar to strata by acquired risks like diabetes, obesity or albuminuria. Prediction of eGFR-decline on the individual level remains challenging by both, genetic or acquired risks. Overall, we provide a simple approach to an age-informative PGS for quantitative disease traits and illustrate its chances and challenges for predicting kidney function and kidney function decline.
What the paper shows and why it matters (AI-generated)
A methods collaboration outside Hartig's usual ecology focus, contributing statistical expertise to a genetic-epidemiology question: standard polygenic scores assume a gene's effect on a trait is constant across age, and this paper shows that assumption measurably mis-specifies kidney-function genetics in particular. Building age into the score via interaction effects improves prediction most exactly where the age-agnostic version is weakest — the young and the very old — though the paper is candid that predicting an individual's future kidney decline, as opposed to population-level patterns, remains hard regardless of which risk factors, genetic or acquired, are used.